INDIVISIBLE Lambertville NJ / New Hope PA

Author: Indivisible Lambertville / New Hope

  • Civics 101: United States Postal Service

    Contributed by Maddy Berlin.

    How often have you worried or complained about the US Postal Service (USPS) over the past months, or year….or years?  How often have you heard others complain or negatively comment about service in recent times?  

    Probably a lot. 

    The USPS came starkly into view with the increase in anxiety over the impact to mail-in voting during the COVID pandemic, when the post office chose that particular time to curtail service, or to announce confusing messages about stamped vs. non-stamped ballots and delivery issues.  Rumors were flying, and trying to understand the facts seemed daunting. 

    We got through the November election, but then packages and letters were delayed or not arriving at all. Many of us have personal stories about holiday cards and packages going undelivered or arriving weeks late, or social security, disability and pension checks not arriving or mail order meds never showing up. 

    The USPS is so important to us, and as much as we may like to complain about it, the USPS is the service we love and want sustained. So what is going on?  

    At the top of the mess is the current Postmaster General, Louis DeJoy, a Trump appointee with a mandate to cut costs and improve efficiency; he actually seems intent on crippling and disabling the agency – probably in support of a Republican plan to privatize the service. Within one month of his May 2020 appointment, he implemented rapid fire change by slashing overtime hours, prohibiting late and extra mail delivery trips, setting stricter delivery schedules and removing mailboxes and sorting machines. More than 7.5 percent of the first-class mail was late in the five weeks that followed, and experience tells us that it probably became even worse. 

    So, fire him, I said. Not so simple, I was told. I decided to do some research about how the USPS is structured, how it’s governed and to take a look at what ails it financially and what can be done.  Here, in a nutshell, is what I learned.

    In 1971, Congress replaced the Post Office Department, a Cabinet position, with the United States Postal Service, an independent entity within the Executive Branch. The USPS is normally operated by a 11 person Board of Governors – the Postmaster General, Deputy Postmaster General and nine governors. The President appoints the nine governors, with Senate approval for seven year terms, and the Board appoints the Postmaster General  who acts as the CEO. The Deputy Postmaster General is appointed by the Board and the Postmaster General. Currently there are six governors, all Trump appointed. There are four vacancies: three governors and the Deputy Postmaster position all need to be filled.

    Financially, the USPS receives no taxpayer money and relies solely on revenue from postage and other services.  While it’s worth noting that Covid-related revenue shortfalls have impacted the USPS’s financials, other factors have plagued the post office as well.  In 2006 Congress passed the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act during a lame-duck session. Under this law, the USPS was required to pre-fund 75 years worth of retiree pension and health care benefits in the span of roughly 10 years! This is utterly absurd, no other entity has this requirement. The USPS generates enough revenue to cover its operating costs but those funding expenses mean the agency has been operating at a loss for years with little hope of digging themselves out without assistance.

    The USPS Fairness Act, passed in the House in 2019 and stalled in the Senate, has been re-introduced and is gaining momentum (interestingly, PA Rep Brian Fitzpatrick is a co-sponsor). The bill would forgive the debt the USPS accumulated while trying to comply with the imposed pre-funding obligation.

    Back to firing DeJoy: this is not a clean-cut process.  As noted, the President does not have the power to remove the Postmaster General. Only the Postal Service Board of Governors has the power to do so.  DeJoy continues to have the support of the Trump-appointed board and has stated he plans on staying in his position and moving ahead with his plans. Some lawmakers want Biden to take drastic action by firing the entire board. In fact, New Jersey Congressman Bill Pascrell (D) wrote a letter to President Biden asking for the entire Board of Governors to be fired. The Board can be fired for “cause,” but it’s possible that process could be difficult or tricky.  The President has not responded to that request to date.

    President Biden does have the power to nominate members of the board, however, and to send them to the Senate — now led by Democrats — for confirmation, so there’s another strategy.  As noted, there are three vacancies plus one member who is serving a hold-over term which means the President can replace him at any time so there are a total of FOUR seats Biden can fill with Democrats. There is an excellent chance his nominees would be approved in the current Senate. If Biden can fill four seats that would flip the Board to a 5-4 Democrat majority and they could remove DeJoy.  

    USPS Factoids.

    • The First US Postmaster General was Benjamin Franklin, appointed by the Second Continental Congress in 1775. 
    • The Pony Express was never part of the US Postal Service
    • 182 million pieces of first class mail are processed and delivered everyday 
    • There are more than 7.3 million postal service employees
    • The USPS has the largest robotic system in the world

    CALL TO ACTION:  Let our MOC’s know we support the USPS Fairness Act. Let the Office of the President and our MOC’s know that we are in favor of turning over the USPS Board of Governors either by firing them or by urging President Biden to fill vacancies ASAP.

  • BUILD POWER – FAST TAKE FOR ACTION

  • Teaching in the Time of Covid Part II

    Contributed by Paige Barnett.

    Covid Log Part II: This is one science teacher’s personal account of suddenly being thrust into online teaching and learning due to the pandemic.  Since the last time that I wrote about my experience in the ILNH August ‘20 Newsletter, I can tell you that teaching in the time of COVID remains a struggle, albeit for different reasons. 

    Over the summer, I continued teaching through the online learning platform for our extended school year (ESY) program. It turned out to be a somewhat good experience while still challenging for many of the same reasons shared in the August newsletter. The social studies teacher with whom I was paired became a  great team. Together, we created a program called A Sense of Place that introduced students to their home state and its unique ecosystem, the New Jersey Pinelands.  It was the perfect amalgam of science and history about the pine barrens.  We actually had fun, and team teaching helped to lighten the load for both of us in terms of parental communication, planning, and offsetting Zoom fatigue, where creating and maintaining meaningful student/teacher relationships is much more challenging. 

    Fast forward to September of 2020, recall that our administration decided to return to in-person learning. 

    As a special education teacher of 20 plus years, I understand the social/emotional needs of our population. As a science teacher, I understand the very real danger of this disease. It leaves me conflicted.  In Part I of Teaching in a Time of Covid, I wrote about the many questions and concerns of returning to in-person learning.  While our administration addressed some of our concerns, I felt they missed the mark in one very important, if not THE most important aspect of protecting staff and students. Masks. And they continue to do so despite my emails and face-to-face meetings pleading with them to mandate wearing a mask 100% of the time in the building. 

    While the CDC provides guidelines for schools and the workplace in  CDC Protecting School Staff,  these guidelines certainly are not best practices. The guidelines also defer frequently to state and local officials, hence blurring the lines of what should be mandated vs. what is actually mandated. My two biggest concerns have been school ventilation and proper mask wearing procedures and rules. 

    When we returned to school in September, some administrative and teaching staff were often seen in their offices or classrooms without wearing masks.  I put on my science teacher hat and gently mentioned that this disease is highly transmissible and that they may want to consider wearing their masks 100% of the time, even when students are not in the room.  Most were pretty agreeable.  Like I always say, when you know better, you do better.  

    Well….

    I expressed my concern in a voice message to our director, however, no reply was forthcoming. Shortly thereafter, I followed up with an email explicitly requesting that she please mandate and model proper mask wearing in the building 100% of the time, and if needed,  staff take mask breaks outside. It should be noted that Governor Murphy mandated that students must wear masks the entire time they are in school. 

    Ironically, the following Monday, the director and I met face to face when she informed me I was exposed to a student who contracted the virus.  This was my first brush with COVID, and while I wasn’t in extreme danger and didn’t have to quarantine, I wasn’t taking any chances. I took myself out and got tested that night. October 7 I received a negative PCR result. 

    Days later,  the HR director stopped by my class, asking what made me think I could tell our director to mandate and model mask wearing. I replied because it’s not my opinion as to whether or not we should mandate the masks, it’s the science behind why we should be wearing the masks. Additionally, Princeton University released a research report the week before stating that children are excellent vectors for transmitting COVID. 

    I expressed how the school may be exposing itself to a liability and that the CDC guidelines are not best practice, merely a guideline. I explained to her that best practice would be to mandate the mask wearing 100% of the time in the building. I likened mask breaks to smoke breaks. People are not allowed to smoke on the school premises and literally have to drive off campus.  Why should taking a mask break be any different? Go outside.  

    October 7 we received an email from our principal that contained the following line,  “Like all schools, we are following required guidelines to keep everyone safe and secure.”  To which I replied with the following:  

    “Then please enforce the mask rule for staff as well. I’m seeing staff members, admin included, in their classes or offices talking to one another with their masks off or down at different times of the day, but mostly at the end of the day.  It’s dangerous to allow staff to take mask breaks in their rooms.  Especially now that the CDC released just yesterday confirmed information for how covid lingers in the air.  Please send an email to all staff with the newly released CDC information regarding transmission and encourage and model the message that wearing a mask at all times is mandatory while in the building.  This isn’t my opinion, this is science. Lives are on the line. I’ve made my concerns known to <name> via email with other suggestions that I’ve given to help keep the building as safe as possible: same suggestions that I supplied in the staff survey, UV lights in bathrooms and with poor circulation, strategically placed in the hallways and toilet seat covers.  <Name> and I spoke briefly about my concern yesterday and I am not satisfied with the answer, to make work ‘bearable” she’ll  allow staff mask breaks in their rooms. And for the record, I hate wearing a mask, but I do it because science and out of consideration for others. I am asking admin to please encourage the mask mandate in the building at all times (except eating). My other concern is that upon learning that we had a positive case in the building, why was school open today? Why Was the CDC 24 hour wait time not utilized and then deep cleaned like districts are doing?” 

    October 9 I received a reply from HR. Apparently, my discussion with our director and subsequent reply to our principal was “unduly confrontational.” HR scheduled a meeting with me, the principal and our director.  In this meeting I made my concerns very clear. Alas, I was told, people are gonna do what they are gonna do, and they’re going to continue to allow the staff to take mask breaks in their rooms.  If I wanted to leave, they would understand. They stated that they consulted with a lawyer and that they were doing as much as they possibly could. I, too, consulted a workman’s comp lawyer. Should I contract covid while on the job, they’ll be hearing from him. 

    We’ve subsequently shifted to remote learning twice since September. In fact, we returned to in-person just this week.  We were informed via email, anyone who had contact with the infected person was consulted. As for a vaccination? March 28 has been the earliest I’ve been able to schedule.  I’ve tried to get in earlier to no avail. I’ll keep trying.  In the meantime, I never take off my mask except to eat. I stay in my class, except when I go grab lunch and I don’t socialize at all. It’s kinda lonely, if not for the students. I’m tired, stressed and frankly, my students know it. Science be damned.

  • Protest at the Jan 19, 2021 Hunterdon County Board of Commissioners Meeting

    Protest at the Jan 19, 2021 Hunterdon County Board of Commissioners Meeting

    Some concerned Hunterdon County residents in front of the Historic Courthouse Tuesday, Jan. 19, protesting the fact that County Commissioner Director Susan Soloway participated in the rally in Washington, D.C., against certifying the results of the presidential election.

     

     

     

     

     

  • ILNH Statement Re: Actions of Susan Soloway

    ILNH Statement Re: Actions of Susan Soloway

    We, the volunteers of Indivisible Lambertville/New Hope, strongly condemn the involvement of the Hunterdon County Board of Commissioners Director Susan Soloway in the “Save America” protest in Washington DC on January 6.  Ms. Soloway knowingly participated in an event aimed at denying and overturning the results of the proven, legitimate election of our next president, Joe Biden, and vice president, Kamala Harris. Her presence at the event, standing side-by-side with those flying Nazi and confederate flags, demonstrates a complete lack of support for our democracy on a large scale, and in the abilities of our County Clerk and Board of Elections to honestly and accurately execute a free and fair election at the county level. 

    We find Ms. Soloway’s participation in this horrifying event to be wholly incongruous with the good government and duties of any elected official. As a board of elected officials who are charged with representing ALL of the residents of Hunterdon County, we expect the Commissioners to be morally and consciously aligned with our Constitution in both private and public life. Ms. Soloway has shown she is not, therefore, we request the immediate actions by the Board: 

    1. An apology by Ms. Soloway to the Board of Elections for her denial of their ability to accurately and honestly execute elections, record and report the results. 
    2. A public statement by Ms. Soloway acknowledging that the elections were free and fair, and that she accepts that Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are the legitimately elected President and Vice President. 
    3. The replacement of Ms. Soloway as director by the Board of Commissioners, effective immediately. 
    4. A public statement by the Board of Commissioners about the remediative steps taken to restore the faith and confidence in the Board of Commissioners damaged by Ms. Soloway’s presence and participation in the Jan. 6 election and the recognition and support of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris as the 46th president and vice president.
    5. The resignation of Ms. Soloway if the above actions are declined. 

    We look forward to the Board of Commissioners taking swift action. 

    Sincerely, 

    Indivisible Lambertville/New Hope