INDIVISIBLE Lambertville NJ / New Hope PA

Author: Indivisible Lambertville / New Hope

  • Voting Rights Watch

    Contributed by Deb Kline.

    Four months after the 2020 election which saw the biggest voter turnout in history, 43 states have introduced 250 new laws aimed at restricting voting. With 14 bills before the state legislature, Pennsylvania is second only to Arizona in seeking to limit access, followed by Georgia and New Hampshire. A wide range of constraints include limits to mail-in balloting, early voting, voter ID and Election Day. For those who are pushing such measures, the claim is that the proposals will protect the integrity of elections. We know differently. 

    On the other hand, Democrats are pushing federal legislation to expand access across the country that could override state limitations. The For the People act, which passed in the House earlier this month, seeks to protect and expand voting rights, increase transparency and security in the electoral process, and get big money out of politics. Now in the Senate, the Skopos Labs prognosis gives the bill an 83% chance of passage. 

    The likelihood of voter restriction bills becoming law depends on the political make-up of each state, and those with a solid red three-way bloc have a better chance of success than those with mixed legislature and governors. Currently, Governor Wolf is likely to veto any bills that pass Pennsylvania’s GOP-heavy legislature, and the legislature is unlikely to be able to override his veto based on its current make-up. In Pennsylvania, an override requires ⅔ of those elected to vote against the veto and the Republicans do not hold that much of a majority. 

    While it’s easy to point to THE BIG LIE as the instigator of the growing number of anti-voting access proposals, the truth is that limiting voting has long been part of the conservative strategy. The belief that only certain people should participate in the electoral process and the running of the country goes back to the dawn of the country and has been a battle fought repeatedly. For every gain, there’s been a step or two or three backwards. 

    For those of us who believe in equality, the battle goes on and it’s incumbent on us to shine a light on those attempts to roll back voting access. Election lawyer Marc Elias expects to continue being busy as these proposals become law and subsequently end up in court. He urges citizens and media to be alert: 

     “I am begging America and the media to pay attention to this. Right now we are facing an avalanche of voter suppression that we have not seen before, at least not since Jim Crow. In state after state—it’s not just Iowa; it’s not just Georgia; it’s not just Arizona… It’s also Montana. It’s also Missouri. It’s also Florida. It’s also Texas. The list goes on and on. Donald Trump told a Big Lie that led to an assault on democracy in the Capitol on January 6. The assaults we’re seeing going on now in state capitols with the legislatures may be less deadly, and be less violent, but they are every bit as damaging to our democracy.” 

    ACTIONS: 

    • Contact your U.S. Senators and demand they support S1: The For The People Act of 2021
    • Contact your Pennsylvania legislators to reject changes to Act 77 that rollback voting access
    • Build power: Use your “Truth Sandwich” create awareness about the need to expand voting access and counter arguments that the proposals will support election integrity

    Sources:

    https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/voting-laws-roundup-february-2021

    https://www.inquirer.com/opinion/editorials/pennsylvania-republican-legislators-repeal-voting-by-mail-20210203.html

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/interactive/2021/voting-restrictions-republicans-states/

    https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/117/hr1

    Know the Opposition: Read what the Conservatives are saying about HR1

  • Just the Facts:  Expanded and Contracted Voting Rights in NJ

    Contributed by Olga Vanucci.

    • Year in which New Jersey gave the right to vote to women and free Blacks:  1776
    • Number of other states that did the same at the time:  Zero
    • Minimum value of property owned that allowed someone to vote:  50 pounds
    • Typical value of property owned by married women:  Zero
    • Number of women who were found to have voted based on poll records:  At least 163
    • Number of free Black men who voted based on poll records:  At least 4, including 2 from the Hopewell Valley
    • Number of free Black women who voted as identified in poll records:  None
    • Year in which New Jersey revoked the right to vote to all but white male taxpayers, following, according to the New York Times, “charges of rampant fraud and corruption, as newspapers filled with tales of elections thrown into chaos by incompetent and easily manipulated ‘petticoat electors,’ to say nothing of men who put on dresses to vote five, six, seven times:”  1807  [It’s unclear why men couldn’t vote five, six, seven times wearing trousers.]

     

    Sources:  When Women Lost the Vote: A Revolutionary Story, 1776 – 1807 – Museum of the American Revolution (amrevmuseum.org) and

    On the Trail of America’s First Women to Vote – The New York Times (nytimes.com) and

    Uncovering a Cemetery’s Lost Black History, Stone by Stone – The New York Times (nytimes.com) – article about Elaine Buck and Beverly Mills, from Hopewell, who spoke to ILNH about their research

  • Trump Banks on His Political Capital

    Contributed by Amara Willey.

    You may have noticed another Donald Trump-related drama unfolding earlier this month. When he presented the GOP with a cease and desist order not to use his name in fundraising efforts, the GOP flatly refused to follow it. This may have seemed like just another stunt of his, but let’s follow the money.

    Before we do that, though, there’s another related story. The Republicans have been actively blaming the mainstream media for trying to divide the party, an idea that CNN reporters vehemently refuted and pointed to many examples of how Republican congress members had criticized the former president.

    In a Washington Post opinion piece published at the end of November, columnist Jennifer Rubin declared that the Republican party had split in two, based not on policy differences, but rather on values and character.

    Senator Rob Portman (R-Ohio) explained that Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky) and former President Trump differed very little on policy though since McConnell’s speech condemning Trump after the impeachment hearing, the enmity has been evident. “It’s not a policy debate. This is a personality issue.“

    Portman continued,It has the potential to hurt the party. It’s already making it more divided. But let’s get back to the policies. That’s where we agree, that’s where the American people want us to focus.”

    Still a number of Republicans have attempted to discredit that idea. For example, former ambassador to the United Nations and current Director of the Save America PAC, Nikki Haley claimed in a Fox News interview that the wedge in the GOP was entirely in the imagination of the media. She said, “The liberal media… Wants to stoke a nonstop Republican Civil War.“

    Haley continued to dissemble, suggesting that perhaps the former president’s actions following the election “were not his finest.”

    This is where the money part comes in. After Donald Trump‘s cease and desist letter to the GOP, the party and the former president had an almost immediate rapprochement. Trump explained that his letter had to do with not wanting those people who had voted for his impeachment to be supported by GOP money connected with his name. Coincidentally, the Republican national committee announced several days later moving a large donor fundraising event to Trump’s Mar A Lago property.

    Trump has been encouraging his supporters to give directly to the Save America PAC, headed by the previously mentioned Nikki Haley, instead of donating to the GOP. He has made it clear that he intends to fund primary challenges for those Congress members who denounced him.

    Vox suggested that the former president may have more than political revenge in mind. And blaming the media for divisions in the GOP may be just another Trump diversionary tactic.

    Whether Trump chooses to follow a path of revenge or not, there is another potential benefit he could reap from funneling money away from the GOP. The Save America PAC is a type of political committee that has relatively few restrictions on what it can do with donations. We have already seen that much of the $31.5 million raised just after the election was not used to fund legal challenges or help with the Georgia runoff‘s, as had been purported, but instead was being funneled into other uses, like paying down campaign debt.

    “If you were going to direct a lot of money from a political committee to yourself, this is the way to do it,“ Jordan Libowitz, communications director for Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), told Vox in an interview earlier this month.

    Trump can use money from the PAC to hold events at his hotels, fund travel, or pay for “consulting fees.“

    “There aren’t a lot of restrictions on travel expenses, so he can rent his own plane for himself and pay himself to fly around the country,“ Lebowitz said. “He can pay Ivanka and the rest of his family very large amounts as consultants for the PAC. He can rent office space for himself.“ 

    Meanwhile, McConnell has made it clear that he will continue to back his fellow incumbent senators, despite Trump’s stated desire to punish some of them. McConnell still influences the use of the Senate Leadership Fund.

    Sources:

  • Call for Climate Action, Awareness, and Communications

    Contributed by Alexis Berends.

    The year is 2050. My son is 34 years old and has his whole life ahead of him. But what does his world look like? Is the spring equinox throbbing with birdsong as flowers emerge from the depths of winter? Are the coral ecosystems still teeming with life and diversity? Are forests still abundant? Or did people choose to ignore the fire in the kitchen when he was just a child, robbing him of the grandeur and splendid beauty that generations before him experienced? 

    After the murder of George Floyd in May of 2020, we collectively said enough. Many white people, such as myself, started to take a deeper look into systemic white supremacy in order to create a better future for generations of BIPOC people the world over. As Layla F. Saad said, we decided to become better ancestors. We began to recognize the inherent risks of ignoring the systemic problem of white supremacy in order to create a more just world for the generations ahead. This work is far overdue and will take many, many years, but we are starting to understand as a global society that it is incredibly necessary to face the ugliness of racism and white supremacy, as challenging as it may be. 

    At the same time, the climate issue is burning right before us and we are hiding in the shadows of ignorance, much as we have hid in the shadows of ignorance towards our own systemic racism. Somehow we believe if we ignore these things long enough they will disappear, but that simply is not true. It’s time we emerge from the shadows and do the work to lay a more sustainable foundation for our children.

    If we continue down the path of “business as usual” in regards to climate future generations will inherit a world vastly different than our own. We have fished our global oceans to the brink of extinction, losing over half of our global fish populations since 1960. Freshwater fish populations, like those in our own Delaware River and its watershed, have declined by 76% since 1970, and 95% of fish sampled in the Delaware River contain microplastics.

    Within our own lifetimes we will face a global refugee crisis that is unprecedented in human history as people flee the disastrous impacts of Climate Change. BIPOC communities in our own nation face the most direct threats, much as we witnessed during Hurricane Katrina and the resulting horrific inaction of the government. 

    At present, only 20% of the global population knows that more than 90% of scientists agree we must meet carbon neutrality by the year 2050 to slow the rate of global warming to 1.5 degrees celsius. That means 80% of people remain in the shadows and lack the understanding that we need to radically transform society if we want to save humankind from imminent demise. 

    Sir David Attenborough said that Climate Change is a communications issue. People aren’t pressing for change because they simply do not understand. Humans aren’t hardwired for crises as existential as the Climate Crisis. But it’s time we start learning and teaching those around us the importance of protecting our environment on a radical level. We need to start having difficult conversations about animal consumption, the fishing industry, the use of pesticides and herbicides in our gardens, and our terminal addiction to plastics. 

    ACTIONS

    Do the work to investigate your personal footprint on this planet. Hold yourself accountable and challenge yourself to make the necessary changes. Switch to a plant based diet or drastically reduce your consumption of animal products. Vote with your dollar by buying local food and products with sustainable packaging (glass, aluminum, paper, cardboard – avoid plastics at all costs because we don’t authentically recycle them). And lastly, get involved in the conversation by becoming an environmental advocate. There are countless ways to volunteer – from picking up trash from the sides of the road to demanding Congress take action.

    We must also hold industry and elected officials accountable for instances of environmental injustice and inequity, demanding they build resiliency in BIPOC communities and close toxic industrial production in those communities. Investigate what sort of industry might be polluting BIPOC communities that you don’t see in your own neighborhood. Ironbound Community Corporation is a fantastic place to start. Push elected officials to pass substantial policies such as the Thrive Agenda, Environmental Justice for All Act, or the Break Free From Plastic Pollution Act – all of which Representative Malinowski has yet to sponsor as of this writing. Familiarize yourself with Cory Booker’s introductions of the Justice for Black Farmers Act and the Climate Stewardship Act. If you live in Pennsylvania, urge your Senators to sponsor these bills

    We must end these toxic industries, clean our waterways, and reevaluate our diets, while increasing Green Jobs in order to guarantee well paying, sustainable jobs to BIPOC communities and beyond. In order to protect our children’s futures, we must spark the conversation and emerge from the darkness.

  • From the Editor

    From the Editor

    It’s Saturday morning in the midst of the second Senate impeachment trial and as Yogi Berra might say, “it’s deja vu all over again.” Too often when putting this newsletter together I find we’re in a critical moment in our history, the outcome uncertain and I am fluctuating between words of hope and suppressing abject despair. 

    This time, however, we have decent, experienced public servants and legislators in the White House and in the majority in the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives. The verdict in this trial may be unknown at the moment, and may in fact, fall short of the outcome we know to be warranted, but the tides are changing. Unlike the tide which are a result of natural forces, however, we must continue our efforts to shore up people and policies that support the people, the environment, our country and our place as global citizens. 

    How do we do this when the country is more divided than ever? Let’s say we didn’t get here overnight. It may seem a daunting task to address the inventory of all the fault lines exposed over these past four plus years, and it will take consistent, daily effort to make incremental change. 

    In my good moments, I am optimistic. I see the executive orders that PRESIDENT Joe Biden has rushed through in less than a month. I see some movement on the Republican side away from the staunch party loyalty that may signal the end of the Grand OLD Party, or the beginning of something new. I see diversity becoming more than a corporate training exercise, and people researching how to have conversations that heal. I see people finding their voice, reclaiming their power and understanding their responsibility to their community, to bringing their energy, skills and talent to rebuilding our democracy on a more solid, secure foundation – one that truly is representative of equality and justice for all the people. 

    As always, I’m awed by the contributions from our team of writers this month. Be sure to check all of them out, as there’s lots to consider, lots to learn and much to do. Above all, be safe, and be well – the light is returning!

    Much love, 

    Deb