INDIVISIBLE Lambertville NJ / New Hope PA

Category: Health and Wellness

  • Teaching in the Time of Covid Part II

    Contributed by Paige Barnett.

    Covid Log Part II: This is one science teacher’s personal account of suddenly being thrust into online teaching and learning due to the pandemic.  Since the last time that I wrote about my experience in the ILNH August ‘20 Newsletter, I can tell you that teaching in the time of COVID remains a struggle, albeit for different reasons. 

    Over the summer, I continued teaching through the online learning platform for our extended school year (ESY) program. It turned out to be a somewhat good experience while still challenging for many of the same reasons shared in the August newsletter. The social studies teacher with whom I was paired became a  great team. Together, we created a program called A Sense of Place that introduced students to their home state and its unique ecosystem, the New Jersey Pinelands.  It was the perfect amalgam of science and history about the pine barrens.  We actually had fun, and team teaching helped to lighten the load for both of us in terms of parental communication, planning, and offsetting Zoom fatigue, where creating and maintaining meaningful student/teacher relationships is much more challenging. 

    Fast forward to September of 2020, recall that our administration decided to return to in-person learning. 

    As a special education teacher of 20 plus years, I understand the social/emotional needs of our population. As a science teacher, I understand the very real danger of this disease. It leaves me conflicted.  In Part I of Teaching in a Time of Covid, I wrote about the many questions and concerns of returning to in-person learning.  While our administration addressed some of our concerns, I felt they missed the mark in one very important, if not THE most important aspect of protecting staff and students. Masks. And they continue to do so despite my emails and face-to-face meetings pleading with them to mandate wearing a mask 100% of the time in the building. 

    While the CDC provides guidelines for schools and the workplace in  CDC Protecting School Staff,  these guidelines certainly are not best practices. The guidelines also defer frequently to state and local officials, hence blurring the lines of what should be mandated vs. what is actually mandated. My two biggest concerns have been school ventilation and proper mask wearing procedures and rules. 

    When we returned to school in September, some administrative and teaching staff were often seen in their offices or classrooms without wearing masks.  I put on my science teacher hat and gently mentioned that this disease is highly transmissible and that they may want to consider wearing their masks 100% of the time, even when students are not in the room.  Most were pretty agreeable.  Like I always say, when you know better, you do better.  

    Well….

    I expressed my concern in a voice message to our director, however, no reply was forthcoming. Shortly thereafter, I followed up with an email explicitly requesting that she please mandate and model proper mask wearing in the building 100% of the time, and if needed,  staff take mask breaks outside. It should be noted that Governor Murphy mandated that students must wear masks the entire time they are in school. 

    Ironically, the following Monday, the director and I met face to face when she informed me I was exposed to a student who contracted the virus.  This was my first brush with COVID, and while I wasn’t in extreme danger and didn’t have to quarantine, I wasn’t taking any chances. I took myself out and got tested that night. October 7 I received a negative PCR result. 

    Days later,  the HR director stopped by my class, asking what made me think I could tell our director to mandate and model mask wearing. I replied because it’s not my opinion as to whether or not we should mandate the masks, it’s the science behind why we should be wearing the masks. Additionally, Princeton University released a research report the week before stating that children are excellent vectors for transmitting COVID. 

    I expressed how the school may be exposing itself to a liability and that the CDC guidelines are not best practice, merely a guideline. I explained to her that best practice would be to mandate the mask wearing 100% of the time in the building. I likened mask breaks to smoke breaks. People are not allowed to smoke on the school premises and literally have to drive off campus.  Why should taking a mask break be any different? Go outside.  

    October 7 we received an email from our principal that contained the following line,  “Like all schools, we are following required guidelines to keep everyone safe and secure.”  To which I replied with the following:  

    “Then please enforce the mask rule for staff as well. I’m seeing staff members, admin included, in their classes or offices talking to one another with their masks off or down at different times of the day, but mostly at the end of the day.  It’s dangerous to allow staff to take mask breaks in their rooms.  Especially now that the CDC released just yesterday confirmed information for how covid lingers in the air.  Please send an email to all staff with the newly released CDC information regarding transmission and encourage and model the message that wearing a mask at all times is mandatory while in the building.  This isn’t my opinion, this is science. Lives are on the line. I’ve made my concerns known to <name> via email with other suggestions that I’ve given to help keep the building as safe as possible: same suggestions that I supplied in the staff survey, UV lights in bathrooms and with poor circulation, strategically placed in the hallways and toilet seat covers.  <Name> and I spoke briefly about my concern yesterday and I am not satisfied with the answer, to make work ‘bearable” she’ll  allow staff mask breaks in their rooms. And for the record, I hate wearing a mask, but I do it because science and out of consideration for others. I am asking admin to please encourage the mask mandate in the building at all times (except eating). My other concern is that upon learning that we had a positive case in the building, why was school open today? Why Was the CDC 24 hour wait time not utilized and then deep cleaned like districts are doing?” 

    October 9 I received a reply from HR. Apparently, my discussion with our director and subsequent reply to our principal was “unduly confrontational.” HR scheduled a meeting with me, the principal and our director.  In this meeting I made my concerns very clear. Alas, I was told, people are gonna do what they are gonna do, and they’re going to continue to allow the staff to take mask breaks in their rooms.  If I wanted to leave, they would understand. They stated that they consulted with a lawyer and that they were doing as much as they possibly could. I, too, consulted a workman’s comp lawyer. Should I contract covid while on the job, they’ll be hearing from him. 

    We’ve subsequently shifted to remote learning twice since September. In fact, we returned to in-person just this week.  We were informed via email, anyone who had contact with the infected person was consulted. As for a vaccination? March 28 has been the earliest I’ve been able to schedule.  I’ve tried to get in earlier to no avail. I’ll keep trying.  In the meantime, I never take off my mask except to eat. I stay in my class, except when I go grab lunch and I don’t socialize at all. It’s kinda lonely, if not for the students. I’m tired, stressed and frankly, my students know it. Science be damned.

  • Teaching in the Time of Covid

    Contributed by Paige Barnett.

    This is one science teacher’s personal account of being thrust into online teaching and learning.  

    Covid log March 2:  “Dear Staff, As you are aware, there is much news and legitimate discussion regarding the coronavirus among our community and schools.  Administration from both the middle school and high school met today to talk about the development of the coronavirus and any potential impact to our school. We are following guidance from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), the New Jersey Department of Health, and the Monmouth County Health Department to keep our school safe from the spread of disease.”  Thereafter, our director outlined the precautions our school would be taking.

    Background: As a pre-vet/animal science major in college. I had a fabulous microbiology professor who once used a lab to demonstrate how quickly disease can spread. I never forgot the lesson. The concept of quarantine is nothing new in the world of agriculture. It’s practiced regularly and with success in saving lives; because that’s precisely the point, to stop the spread of disease and to save lives.  Livestock can not cross state lines without health certs. Why? So that if disease breaks out it can be traced to the origin and stopped. It’s called practicing biosecurity.  I’ve experienced quarantine of entire farms and have practiced biosecurity measures and it works.

    When Covid-19 cases were reported in Washington state, I began educating myself on the epidemiology of this disease. What gave me pause is the stealth of this virus with a two week, asymptomatic incubation period.  I teach in a private school where our students come from many sending districts.  My first thought was…”We’re (faculty and staff) sitting ducks.” 

    The reality of this is, all teachers in all districts across the country are sitting ducks. Even before directed by our administration, I began teaching my students about proper hand washing, not touching their faces, and wiping down their desks before and after class.  They all, (I hope) will remember what I taught them about how disease spreads and will continue to protect themselves. Many of my students live in counties that were hardest hit by Covid-19.  While I can’t be sure of who lost loved ones, we lost two members of our immediate school community.  The grief is real.

    Flashback to March 13th: We attended an emergency meeting on Friday, March 13th (go figure). We discussed how to proceed with online learning.  I hoped we could meet with students on Monday and walk them through the process, but alas, it was not to be. The dreaded email arrived March 15th stating we would be teaching online beginning Monday March 16th. To the credit of our administration, staff, and IT department we went live and online in less than 72 hours!  IT made sure students who didn’t have computers received one and a hot spot so they’d have access to online learning.  As for me, I began preparing a few weeks prior. I uploaded files to the cloud so I’d have remote access. I was familiar with how to use Zoom meetings and was already using Google classroom to upload assignments. That was the easy part. The hard part…interacting, creating and maintaining relationships with students via a virtual classroom.  

    Nothing can replace teaching in-person. Nothing. I mean, forget about the fact that teaching science is a hands-on kind of learning. The real challenge is in maintaining robust relationships where we can gauge our students, read their body language, and adjust to their needs. This is lost in a virtual classroom. Relationships with the students are at the heart of teaching. Being able to create an environment where students can check their baggage at the classroom door and just be a student in a safe space is lost.  Aside from relationships, what normally could be accounted for in person such as homework, behaviors etc, now had to be sent in multiple emails to parents, administration and documented in our online school accounting and attendance system.  

    Teaching online is, in a word, stressful. Very.

    Fast forward to September:  Fall is quickly approaching. It will not be business as usual.  Districts are scrambling to prepare their schools with safety policies and procedures.  As for my school, I have concerns.  So many questions, such as will we be able to keep the six feet spacing? How will students move from class to class?  Will we have our ventilation system updated with U.V. filtration systems?  How will students use the bathroom?  How will students get their lunch?  How will students be held accountable for maintaining their distance?   I am already well aware that some of our elementary students are resisting the mask mandate.  What will this look like?  Will we offer remote learning for parents who choose to keep their children home?  I am concerned for our immuno-compromised staff and family members.  What will it look like if someone from our school tests positive for Covid?  

    Is it worth the risk?  I say, no it’s not. I’ve voiced my opinions and I’ve even been asked by human resources if I plan to return to school. Will we receive hazard pay?  Do I get a choice about teaching remotely if I want or need to? I do plan to return, but putting my life on the line certainly was never something I thought I’d have to do for teaching. Suffice it to say, I will have to “put my affairs in order” before returning this fall. I’ve also ordered all the PPE I will need to protect myself. Never thought I’d have to order PPE for the classroom.  Wonder if I can write that off?  Oh yeah, right. The Trump tax reform took away write-offs for teachers who purchase school supplies.    

    And now a little about science education.  It matters. It matters because the public should understand the urgency of how contagious Covid-19 is and how to best protect themselves.  Wearing a mask shouldn’t even be a question about constitutional rights. It is pointedly a matter of life-saving consideration for others. I am thankful for the knowledge I could share with my students. They understand the science of the situation and most importantly could prepare and protect themselves. What’s maddening, is that all of this –  ALL. OF. THIS. – could have been prevented.  It’s mind boggling to me that Trump dismantled the pandemic team.  In my gut, I knew that we were in for a long haul.  I just hope the people who have died will not have died in vain, that the masses will be motivated to vote their values and that their values include saving the lives of others.  

    Godspeed to the teachers.

  • Fast-tracking COVID-19 Vaccine Poses Some Threats

    Contributed by Amara Willey.

    The FDA announced at the end of June that any vaccine candidate would need to demonstrate a high effectiveness level before going into more widespread human trials. The agency could issue an emergency use authorization (EUA), but indicated that might be counterproductive.

    “Any misstep risks eroding confidence in vaccines that could have lasting implications,” explained Lois Privor-Dumm, policy director at the International Vaccine Access Center at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.  

    Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Missouri), the chairman of a Senate Appropriations subcommittee, has raised concerns about surveys showing that roughly half of Americans would be reluctant to get a COVID-19 vaccine and 20% don’t plan to get one. Blunt promised that research into candidate vaccines would not move too fast or cut corners, citing the effectiveness of the smallpox and polio vaccines.

    The FDA guidelines suggest that the agency will not be so quick to agree to EUA, according to Barron’s. If it did not, the vaccine could take much longer, up to four years, to develop safely.

    Currently, pharmaceutical companies Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Pfizer Inc. and Moderna Inc. are taking part in the administration’s “Warp Speed” program, in the race to develop and produce a vaccine that could be widely distributed.

    The FDA has mandated that any vaccine show an initial effectiveness rate of more than 50% over a placebo before going into larger scale human trials. The Pfizer vaccine has demonstrated initial positive results in a trial of 45 human subjects but whether that company will meet the FDA standards is unknown. Several companies, including Moderna, are embarking on phase two testing in larger human trials.

    Pfizer announced that it is planning a 30,000-person trial by the end of July with its Germany-based partner, BioNTech. The company claims that it will be able to release a vaccine by October and produce 100 million vaccines by the end of the year. Pfizer plans include the release of 1.2 billion doses of the vaccine in 2021 if successful.

    Head of Pfizer, Albert Bourla, said, “If things go well, and the stars are aligned, we will have enough evidence of safety and efficacy so that we can… have a vaccine around the end of October,” according to the Associated French Press and reported by The Jerusalem Post.

    This timeline is not coincidental. An approved vaccine by the fall could mean re-election for Donald Trump. It could also mean a rise in stocks in a number of sectors and be good for the economy overall.

    The federal government is funding many of the vaccine-development projects, and there is some concern that the administration will apply pressure to release the vaccine before the election. The FDA’s guidance seems to alleviate some fears that the vaccine will be approved before it’s safe to do so.

    “Even if the science delivers, our political leaders may fail the test by overly politicizing the process to a point that it will take longer than anticipated for a sufficient number of people to agree to be vaccinated to reach herd immunity in the U.S.,” according to Beacon Policy Advisors founder Brandon Barford.

    Three top scientists involved in Operation Warp Speed deny political pressure from the White House or other agencies in terms of the selection of companies to develop a vaccine, the timing of vaccine development, the announcement of a vaccine or “any other aspect that is part of your responsibility on the medical side,” according to Dr. Francis Collins, the director of the National Institutes of Health. The other two scientists were Dr. Robert Redfield, director of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and Dr. Gary Disbrow, acting director of the federal Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA). Disbrow said, “”I’m a scientist, not a politician.”

    If the vaccine does receive EUA status, it will be released first to health-care workers. This would ease the need for politicians to impose further lockdowns and would help the economy, according to Michael Brush, a financial writer for the New York Times and The Economist. However, it would not necessarily prevent a fall-winter resurgence of the virus.

    With the FDA’s standards for an emergency use authorization not much lower than what’s needed for full approval, the first authorization seems more likely to happen in early 2021, said Geoffrey Porges, an analyst with SVB Leerink, Bloomberg reported.

    The announcement by U.S. regulators should put citizens at ease as it “suggests that regardless of political pressure, the FDA continues to apply sound regulatory judgment and expertise to the development of all medical products, particularly vaccines, regardless of the severity of the economic, political, or public health urgency of the current situation,” Porges said. “For that integrity, the general public, the biopharma industry, and all of its investors should be grateful.”

    The federal government has allocated more than $9 billion for Operation Warp Speed to research and develop COVID-19 vaccines. It has pledged to manufacture candidate vaccines even before it’s clear whether they will work, to ensure that a supply will be immediately available if one or more are shown to be safe and effective. 

    Dr. Collins of the NIH warned that the current approach of Operation Warp Speed – with a lot of drugs potentially being thrown out – will be expensive, but that the current national emergency demands such aggressive action. 

    Operation Warp Speed appears to have access to substantial resources. Congress has directed almost $10 billion through supplemental funding, including the CARES Act. In addition, more than $6.5 billion was designated for countermeasure development through BARDA and $3 billion for NIH research.

    The list of institutions involved in the operation includes almost every medical entity within the federal government, including the FDA, CDC, NIH and BARDA as well as the Defense Department, private firms and other federal agencies, including the Department of Agriculture, the Department of Energy and the Department of Veterans Affairs.

    Warp Speed will be run by a mix of scientists, regulators, and the military, with the presumption that only the U.S. military will have the capability to rapidly distribute and deploy a vaccine or vaccines once they are available. 

    Sources:

  • CoronaVirus Exposes Gaping Holes in the Social Safety Net

     Contributed by Deb Kline.

    The impacts of the coronavirus on individuals and businesses have exposed gaping holes in the social safety net. As Congress and the administration now rush to find solutions to supporting those who are suddenly out of work or working under extremely reduced hours, who are without insurance coverage or paid sick leave, suddenly the more progressive platforms are looking like plausible ways to keep the country from further devastation. Ideas like checks to individuals and (somewhat) free healthcare are being seriously discussed, even  if they are temporary stop-gap measures. 

    How it must stick in the craw of many of the hardened conservatives who have been hacking away at the social safety net since the New Deal. It’s no surprise that all of the nays on the  second coronavirus relief bill in the Senate came from the Republican side of the aisle, which ultimately passed the Senate. Now, Republicans are taking up a Phase 3 emergency bill, which would include $50 billion to aid the hard-hit airline industry, $150 billion for other distressed sectors of the economy, two rounds of direct payments of $250 billion each on April 6 and May 18, and the creation of a small business interruption loan program. A vote is expected on this bill sometime this week. 

    Side note: The relief to the airline industry and other large businesses rankles many who feel that many of them squandered their corporate tax cuts as well as the 2008 bailouts on stock buybacks and boosting executive salaries. Elizabeth Warren has much to say about conditions that need to be in place to avoid similar behavior. 

    For an administration that has been loath to do anything to help individuals outside of the “1 percenters,” you know they’re running scared of the current free-fall of the economy. While boasting of the “best economy” and “lowest unemployment numbers” ever, the truth has shown it’s ugly face: PEOPLE CAN’T SPEND MONEY IF THEY DON’T HAVE ANY. 

    Democrats and progressives have understood milking the members of the middle and poorer economic groups is a strategy ultimately doomed to fail. The argument against social safety net programs has been that they make people dependent on the government and that they smack of socialism, which is a very slippery slope into communism. But it’s been the social safety net programs that have often lifted this country out of depressions and recessions, gotten people back to work and enabled them to purchase the goods and services that keep the wheels of the economy running. 

    Not to mention it’s the right thing to do. Every moral guidepost extolls compassion, care for the sick, care for the least among us, care for your neighbor. Gwendolyn Brooks wrote: 

    “We are each other’s harvest; we are each other’s business; we are each other’s magnitude and bond.”

    Perhaps the outcome of this crisis will be the recognition that the business of America is not in its corporations, but in its people. If they truly want to create shareholder value, then the investments should be in the people and in the communities in which we live.  

    For more on just how much this administration has chipped away at Social Safety Net programs, even before the Coronavirus, see Donald Trump’s Assault on the Social Safety Net  in Washington Monthly’s February edition.

    Resources: 

    https://www.politico.com/news/2020/03/18/congress-emergency-coronavirus-stimulus-package-135444
    https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/488256-senate-gop-expects-vote-on-third-coronavirus-package-next-week

  • Keeping the Peace through the Season: When Silence is Golden

    Contributed by Deb Kline.

    I’ve always found a bit of disconnect that the most frenzied of season of the year plays out against a backdrop of Peace on Earth. Don’t get me wrong – there’s very much about this time of year to love, and so many things are worse than sharing a heartfelt sentiment for peace. But with the added political, environmental, immigration and other crises, we may truly struggle to find that sense of peace we so badly need.  

    Yet, finding some semblance of equilibrium in the midst of all this is critical to our physical, mental and emotional health. As you schedule the parties and to-dos into your calendar, also schedule this: moments of silence. 

    Not going to lie, for some, silence is the last place they’d want to be. Who hasn’t woken in the middle of the night – a perfectly fine time to spend in silence – to the wailing of anxieties, unresolved histories, and purely ridiculous concerns that disappear in the light of day? That’s why it’s even more important to carve out time every day to just unplug from it all, to reflect and restore balance. 

    The physical benefits of silence are extensive, with positive impacts to the circulatory, hormone and immune systems, plus brain cell growth. Perhaps more importantly, the time you spend in silence can help provide you with the strength, insight and self-composure that enables you to survive and thrive that can also positively affect those around you.

    Schedule time to do nothing. Sit or walk in nature. Gaze at a candle or fire. Sit quietly with a cup of tea, feel the warmth in your hands. Take mindful moments. Find peace.