INDIVISIBLE Lambertville NJ / New Hope PA

Author: Indivisible Lambertville / New Hope

  • Action Group: Building Community

    Action Group: Building Community is about bringing our ILNH constituents together as a functional, motivated and grassroots organization that is effective, collaborative and fun. This is the organizing arm of the organization, planning and executing events and outreach and all the nitty gritty tasks to make it happen. Building community is also working with our alliances to exponentially grow impact and awareness.

    Educate! 

    • Learn more at the February 27 Zoom Gathering about how you can help ILNH Build Community.

    Resources:

  • Synopsis of the For The People Act

    The For the People Act is a comprehensive and appropriately aggressive set of reforms that would revitalize and improve our democracy.

    Voting Rights The FTPA aims to expand and protect this most fundamental right and bring voting into the 21st century:

    • Modernize Voter Registration – move to electronic systems pen & paper.
    • Automatic Voter Registration – every eligible citizen who interacts with designated government agencies, such as the Department of Motor Vehicles (“DMV”), a public university, or a social service agency, is automatically registered to vote, unless they decline registration.
    • Same-Day and Online Registration – boost voter participation by establishing same- day and online registration.
    • Protect Against Flawed Purges – creates strong protections against improper purges/puts new guardrails on the use of interstate databases; prohibits election officials from relying on a citizen’s failure to vote in an election as reason to remove them from the rolls; requires election officials to provide timely notice to removed voters, as well as an opportunity to remedy their registration before an election.
    • Restore the Voting Rights Act -The FTPA contains an express commitment to restore the full protections of the Voting Rights Act.
    • Restore Voting Rights to People with Prior Convictions – The FTPA adopts a simple and fair rule: if you are out of prison and living in the community, you get to vote in federal elections; also requires states to provide written notice to individuals with criminal convictions when their voting rights are restored.
    • Strengthen Mail Voting Systems The FTPA would also create a baseline standard for access to mail voting in federal elections.
    • Institute Nationwide Early Voting – alleviate problems of long lines & inability to get to polls by guaranteeing a minimum two-week period for early voting in federal elections.
    • Protect Against Deceptive Practices – The FTPA increases criminal penalties for false or misleading statements, as well as intimidation, aimed at impeding or preventing a person from voting or registering to Second, it empowers citizens to go to court to stop voter deception. Third, it blunts the effect of deceptive information by requiring designated government officials to disseminate accurate, corrective information to voters.

    Campaign Finance We need to overhaul the role of money in politics. We should pass reforms to counteract the worst effects of Citizens United and amplify the voices of everyday Americans in our campaigns.

    • Small Donor Public Financing – To truly counteract the worst effects of Citizens United, we need to create a small-donor public financing system for federal This reform will give candidates a viable option to fund their campaigns without relying on wealthy campaign donors and enable working Americans to increase the financial support they can provide to candidates who champion their policy preferences. The FTPA addresses these problems head-on by amplifying the voices of the everyday voters, primarily through small donor matching. In addition to small donor matching, the FTPA also creates a pilot program to provide eligible donors with $25 in “My Voice Vouchers” to give to congressional candidates of their choice in increments of $5.
    • The FTPA revamps the presidential public financing system which currently provides matching funds to primary candidates and block grants to general election nominees. The FTPA addresses this problem by increasing the primary match to a six-to- one ratio, providing matching funds to party nominees in the general election and repealing burdensome limits on how much participating candidates can spend.
    • Shoring Up Other Critical Campaign Finance Rules – We must also fortify other critical campaign finance rules to curb dark money, counter foreign interference in S. elections, and make it harder to sidestep campaign contribution limits. The FTPA takes several key steps to deal with these problems:
      1. It closes legal loopholes that have allowed dark money to proliferate by requiring all groups that spend significant sums on campaigns to disclose the donors who pay for that spending.
      2. It expands transparency requirements to apply to online campaign ads on the same terms as those run on more traditional It also strengthens the “paid for” disclaimers that are required to be included in such ads.
      3. It requires the largest online platforms, with over 50 million unique visitors per month, to establish a public file of requests to purchase political ads akin to the file broadcasters have long been required to maintain.
      4. It tightens restrictions on coordination between candidates and all outside groups that can raise unlimited funds.
    • Overhaul the FEC – A third important priority is to overhaul the dysfunctional Federal Election Commission, which has failed to meaningfully enforce existing rules and would almost certainly struggle to implement other ambitious The FTPA addresses the main flaws of the FEC through several targeted changes:
      1. Curtails gridlock by reducing the number of commissioners from six to five, with no more than two affiliated with any party — effectively requiring one commissioner to be a tie-breaking independent.
      2. Provides the commission with a real, presidentially appointed chairperson to serve as its chief administrative officer.
      3. Ends the practice of allowing commissioners to remain in office indefinitely past the expiration of their terms, which has given Congress and the president an excuse to avoid appointing new members, likely contributing to the agency’s recent loss of its quorum.
      4. Streamlines the commission’s enforcement process by giving its nonpartisan staff authority to investigate alleged campaign finance violations and dismiss frivolous complaints.

    Redistricting Reform – Extreme partisan gerrymandering is another threat to our democracy’s long-term health. We should require independent citizen commissions for congressional redistricting; outlaw partisan gerrymandering and establish other clear criteria for drawing lines; and make the redistricting process more transparent and participatory. The need for redistricting reform is urgent. Extreme gerrymandering has reached levels unseen in the last 50 years. The FTPA offers bold and comprehensive solutions to the problem of gerrymandering:

    1. Requires states to use independent redistricting commissions to draw congressional maps.
    2. Imposes a uniform set of rules for how districts should be drawn, expressly outlawing partisan gerrymandering.
    3. Prioritizes criteria like keeping geographically concentrated communities with shared interests together.
    4. Commissions would contain equal numbers of Republican, Democratic, and unaffiliated and third party commissioners, with voting rules that ensure that no one group would be able to dominate the redistricting process.
    5. All potential commissioners would be screened for conflicts of interest to ensure that they do not have a personal stake in the outcome.
    6. Commission business would be conducted in open public meetings and subject to oversight.
    7. Data would be made available and all official communications would be subject to disclosure.
    8. Community groups and members would get a say through testimony and other feedback mechanisms.
    9. Each commission would be required to show its work and ensure fairness by issuing a detailed report before taking a final vote on a plan.

    Election Security – We must also take critical steps to improve the security and reliability of our election infrastructure. The FTPA significantly bolsters the security and resilience of our nation’s election administration infrastructure. Among the most critical reforms, it:

    1. Requires states to replace insecure paperless voting systems – mandates the replacement of all paperless electronic voting machines with machines that require an individual paper record of each vote.
    2. Promotes robust audits of electronic election results – provides funds for states to implement robust audits of election results using statistical models to ensure that a sufficient number of paper ballots are checked to corroborate the electronic vote tallies.
    3. Imposes new requirements for private election system vendors – Among other things, any vendors who receive grants under the act would be required to:
      1. Certify that the infrastructure they sell to local election jurisdictions is developed and maintained in accordance with cybersecurity best practices;
      2. Verify that their own information technology is maintained in accordance with cybersecurity best practices;
      3. Promptly report any suspected cybersecurity incident directed against the goods and services they provide under these grants.

    Ethics – Finally, we must establish stronger ethics rules for all three branches of government. These provisions would be an essential first step towards shoring up eroding constraints on self- dealing at the highest levels of government. The For the People Act addresses this challenge. Among the most important changes, it:

    • Requires the president and vice president to adhere to the same broad ethical standards as the millions of government employees who work under them, consistent with voluntary practices to which every president going back to the 1960s adhered until President Trump took office;
    • Requires the president, vice president, and candidates for those offices to disclose their tax returns, also consistent with longstanding voluntary norms;
    • Strengthens the Office of Government Ethics, which oversees ethical compliance in the executive branch;
    • Strengthens safeguards against congressional conflicts of interest;
    • Strengthens constraints on the “revolving door” between government and industry that prevent former officials from unduly profiting off their time in public service; and
    • Requires a code of ethics for the United States Supreme

    Summarized from The Brennan Center for Justice: Why Congress Must Pass the ‘For the People Act’ by Wendy Weiser, Daniel I. Weiner, and Dominique Erney:  https://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/2021- 02/2021_01_Case%20for%20HR1_update_V4.pdf

    Summarized by Indivisible Lambertville/New Hope 6/13/21

  • From the Editor

    On Friday, the Federal Department of Labor’s employment numbers came in and the news wasn’t all that great: Only 266,000 non-farming jobs were added compared to expectations of over a million. There’s great consternation over the why of it, with apparently 1.1 jobs available for every unemployed person. The markets, however, went ‘ho-hum,’ with the disappointing news offset by the speculation that this would keep interest rates low. 

    Many are quick to blame the extra money the federal government provides to boost unemployment – all $300 per week. I’ve heard it from local business people and national news. 

    I’m not so sure. 

    With great apologies for this onslaught of numbers, here’s something to consider:  At the low end, if a worker was making minimum wage of $7.25/hour and worked a 40 hour week, their gross pay would be $290. Unemployment in NJ pays 60 percent of the gross wages so they’d get $174 on unemployment, and with the extra $300 they’d get $474 per week, which brings them up to $11.85/hr. 

    A living wage in NJ is currently $16.20; In Pennsylvania, $13.02 (see Income Equality and the Bare Minimum blog in this edition). Assume also that the unemployed worker now has no healthcare coverage unless they’ve applied and qualified for Obamacare. COBRA is ridiculously expensive. And if anyone has ever applied for unemployment, the process isn’t exactly smooth sailing. 

    So what’s going on? I don’t have any educated answers and look forward to seeing what others who do come up with. I do know that it’s largely the service industries that are bemoaning the lack of available and interested labor, but have also made the biggest gains as things begin to open up. Is there a lack of affordable housing and transportation in the areas where businesses are lacking employees? Have some decided that a career change might provide more stability? Is there reluctance to return to work because of concerns or lack of COVID protections? 

    The picture is more complex than the assumption that people don’t want to return to work because they make more on unemployment. This argument is a thinly disguised resurrection of the “welfare queens” fable that the Reagan administration promoted. The same administration that gave us the trickle down economy, the war against unions and decline of worker protections. The GOP, that is now trying to lay claim that it’s the party of Blue Collar Workers. I nearly choked on my tea when I heard that one. 

    The American Jobs Plan and the Green New Deal have the potential for job creation like we haven’t seen since FDR. A majority of them are likely to be blue collar jobs and well-paying ones at that. Many will require new training programs and can be sited in areas that have lost or will lose jobs as older industries fade(d). Yet the GOP stands staunchly in opposition to any such plan. Why? It would raise taxes on the wealthy and businesses and close loopholes that allow them to avoid paying their share. Yet the proposed increase in taxes is still well below what it was even under GW Bush – AFTER his tax cut package: 28% proposed vs 35% under Bush.

    If there is a champion of the blue collar worker, of a healthy, economic recovery and of closing the income inequality gap, it is the Biden-Harris administration and the Democrats in Congress and states who are fighting to make it happen. But the very slim margin of Dems vs GOP means that we must continue to work to elect and re-elect those who truly work for the public good, continue to make our voices heard, continue to shoot down misinformation about why we can’t afford to raise the minimum wage or provide national healthcare – which will take a huge burden off businesses and democratize access, and fight to eliminate or modify the filibuster so it doesn’t get in the way of progress. 

    The opportunity is right now. We have the power, we can make it happen. Let’s do this!

    Much Love, 

    Deb

  • Income Inequality and The Bare Minimum: Is a $15/hour Minimum Wage Enough?

    Contributed by Deb Kline.

    One of the major platforms that progressives have pushed well before President Biden took office is increasing the minimum wage to $15/hour. Many were disappointed to see the wage hike jettisoned from the American Rescue Plan, a victim of the need to get the package through budget reconciliation and avoid a GOP filibuster.  On April 27, however, the Biden-Harris administration signed an executive order that will give raises to up to 390,000 workers by establishing a $15/hour minimum wage for all federal contractors, with the requirement that all federal agencies must include the higher wage in new contract offerings by Jan. 30 of 2022.

    Realistically speaking, is $15/hour enough? In New Jersey, where Governor Murphy signed a legislation incrementally increasing the minimum wage from $8.25 in 2019 to $15 in 2024, the cost of living is roughly 21 percent higher than the average nationally. A living wage for a single adult with no children is $16.20, compared to the current minimum of $11 according to MIT research. 

    In Pennsylvania, minimum wage is the same as the current federally-set minimum at $7.25/hour. While Governor Wolfe has proposed increases in his 2021 budget address, that would only be by .50 cents per year until 2027! The current living wage in the state for a single adult with no children is $13.39 according to MIT. 

    Further, a 2020 National Low Income Housing Coalition analysis showed that workers earning $15 an hour can afford a two-bedroom apartment in just four states: Arkansas, Kentucky, Mississippi and West Virginia.

    What is unconscionable is that the numbers at the top end of wage earners are staggering, 719 billionaires held more wealth than 160 million Americans: $4.56 TRILLION vs $1.01 trillion. For these upper earners, the pandemic was a boon as U.S. billionaire pandemic wealth increased by $1.6 Trillion, or 55%, representing one-third of gains over the last 31 years.

    The pushback against increasing the minimum wage has been and continues to be that a higher minimum means jobs will be lost, so the claims about the gains in livability are offset by the loss of jobs. In fact, even the Congressional Budget Office as recently as this year has published such a statement: 

    Congressional Budget Office: How would increasing the minimum wage affect employment? Raising the minimum wage would increase the cost of employing low-wage workers. As a result, some employers would employ fewer workers than they would have under a lower minimum wage. However, for certain workers or in certain circumstances, employment could increase.

    Changes in employment would be seen in the number of jobless, not just unemployed, workers. Jobless workers include those who have dropped out of the labor force (for example, because they believe no jobs are available for them) as well as those who are searching for work.

    Yet, a September 2019 report by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York that found the minimum wage hike in New York State had no immediate discernible effect on job loss, and research published earlier this year suggests that raising the minimum wage by just $1 could lead to a drop in suicide rates

    There is also a claim that corporations will do just fine if the minimum wage is mandated at $15, but it’s the small, “Main Street” businesses that will be most adversely affected. While many smaller businesses struggle with what increases will mean for them, i.e. layoffs, higher prices, some economists say that a minor increase in prices may not be detrimental to the business and accounted for by overall inflation. In addition, a higher wage could mean less turnover – something that’s extremely costly to any business –  and a better, happier worker. 

    The initial thinking about the impact of a higher minimum wage on job loss seems to have shifted, according to economist David Cooper, senior analyst at the Economic Policy Institute. After studying some of the states that had mandated a higher minimum wage, Cooper says “economists generally think that the minimum wage’s impact on jobs is fairly small to the point where it’s probably going to be economically not that meaningful on the grand scheme of things.”

    Research from the Fiscal Policy Institute examined three years of small business activity in states that increased the minimum wage above federal standards as well as states that did not. These were some of the researchers’ findings:

    • From 1998 to 2001, the number of small business establishments grew at a rate of 3.1% in states with higher minimum wages, compared with a rate of 1.6% in states with lower minimum wages.
    • Employment grew 1.5% more quickly in states with higher minimum wages.
    • Annual payroll and average payroll per worker increased more quickly in states with higher minimum wages.

    Moreover, additional research published in the Journal of Economic Issues found that minimum wage hikes did not correlate with an increase in small business failures. That research even suggested the opposite is true.

    Arguments against raising the minimum wage appear to dissipate under closer scrutiny, and provide little to no excuse for maintaining a class of working poor in one of the richest countries on the planet. It’s a fact that the poor pay more. In addition, in many cases, those making minimum wage or even higher are subsidized by taxpayer-funded programs such as SNAP, which is also a continual target for those against supporting any government programs aimed at helping those in need (DO YOU HEAR ME GOP?). 

    So, is a $15 minimum wage too much or barely enough? Is it enough to cover uncovered healthcare expenses? Or childcare for one child in NJ where there’s an average cost of $1000/month? Or rent in Philadelphia at $1,652 /month? To cover energy, food, transportation, maintenance and other costs typical for a household? 

    Nope. It’s not enough, but it’s a start. 

    Call to Action: 

    • Call your Senators to support S.53 and Representatives to support HR.603, the Raise the Wage Act of 2021.
    • Support companies that pay a higher than minimum wage. (CAVEAT: check for other practices that may offset the positives. An app called BUYCOTT, enables you to check products and companies for the good, bad and ugly). 

    Sources: 

  • Just the facts – Jobs

    Contributed by Olga Vanucci.

    • The U.S. is down 8.2 million jobs from the pre-pandemic employment level.
    • The American Jobs Plan is expected to create millions of jobs and in the process:
      • Fix highways; rebuild bridges; and upgrade ports, airports, and transit centers.  [construction jobs]
      • Rebuild clean drinking water infrastructure, a renewed electric grid, and high-speed broadband to all Americans.  [construction and technical jobs]
      • Modernize homes, commercial buildings, schools, and federal buildings.  [construction jobs]
      • Create caregiving jobs and raise wages and benefits for essential home care workers.  [home care jobs]
      • Revitalize manufacturing, ensure products are made in America, and invest in innovation.  [manufacturing and engineering jobs]
      • Create good-paying union jobs and train Americans for jobs of the future.  
    • Alongside the American Jobs Plan is the Made in America Tax Plan to make sure corporations pay their fair share and encourage job creation at home. The Made in America Tax Plan would fully pay for the American Jobs Plan within 15 years, if passed alongside one another.

    Sources:  New York Times and  American Jobs Plan | The White House (short version) and FACT SHEET: The American Jobs Plan | The White House (long version) and What’s in the $2 trillion jobs bill? Joe Biden’s American Jobs Act, explained. – Vox