INDIVISIBLE Lambertville NJ / New Hope PA

Author: Indivisible Lambertville / New Hope

  • Teaching in the Time of Covid

    Contributed by Paige Barnett.

    This is one science teacher’s personal account of being thrust into online teaching and learning.  

    Covid log March 2:  “Dear Staff, As you are aware, there is much news and legitimate discussion regarding the coronavirus among our community and schools.  Administration from both the middle school and high school met today to talk about the development of the coronavirus and any potential impact to our school. We are following guidance from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), the New Jersey Department of Health, and the Monmouth County Health Department to keep our school safe from the spread of disease.”  Thereafter, our director outlined the precautions our school would be taking.

    Background: As a pre-vet/animal science major in college. I had a fabulous microbiology professor who once used a lab to demonstrate how quickly disease can spread. I never forgot the lesson. The concept of quarantine is nothing new in the world of agriculture. It’s practiced regularly and with success in saving lives; because that’s precisely the point, to stop the spread of disease and to save lives.  Livestock can not cross state lines without health certs. Why? So that if disease breaks out it can be traced to the origin and stopped. It’s called practicing biosecurity.  I’ve experienced quarantine of entire farms and have practiced biosecurity measures and it works.

    When Covid-19 cases were reported in Washington state, I began educating myself on the epidemiology of this disease. What gave me pause is the stealth of this virus with a two week, asymptomatic incubation period.  I teach in a private school where our students come from many sending districts.  My first thought was…”We’re (faculty and staff) sitting ducks.” 

    The reality of this is, all teachers in all districts across the country are sitting ducks. Even before directed by our administration, I began teaching my students about proper hand washing, not touching their faces, and wiping down their desks before and after class.  They all, (I hope) will remember what I taught them about how disease spreads and will continue to protect themselves. Many of my students live in counties that were hardest hit by Covid-19.  While I can’t be sure of who lost loved ones, we lost two members of our immediate school community.  The grief is real.

    Flashback to March 13th: We attended an emergency meeting on Friday, March 13th (go figure). We discussed how to proceed with online learning.  I hoped we could meet with students on Monday and walk them through the process, but alas, it was not to be. The dreaded email arrived March 15th stating we would be teaching online beginning Monday March 16th. To the credit of our administration, staff, and IT department we went live and online in less than 72 hours!  IT made sure students who didn’t have computers received one and a hot spot so they’d have access to online learning.  As for me, I began preparing a few weeks prior. I uploaded files to the cloud so I’d have remote access. I was familiar with how to use Zoom meetings and was already using Google classroom to upload assignments. That was the easy part. The hard part…interacting, creating and maintaining relationships with students via a virtual classroom.  

    Nothing can replace teaching in-person. Nothing. I mean, forget about the fact that teaching science is a hands-on kind of learning. The real challenge is in maintaining robust relationships where we can gauge our students, read their body language, and adjust to their needs. This is lost in a virtual classroom. Relationships with the students are at the heart of teaching. Being able to create an environment where students can check their baggage at the classroom door and just be a student in a safe space is lost.  Aside from relationships, what normally could be accounted for in person such as homework, behaviors etc, now had to be sent in multiple emails to parents, administration and documented in our online school accounting and attendance system.  

    Teaching online is, in a word, stressful. Very.

    Fast forward to September:  Fall is quickly approaching. It will not be business as usual.  Districts are scrambling to prepare their schools with safety policies and procedures.  As for my school, I have concerns.  So many questions, such as will we be able to keep the six feet spacing? How will students move from class to class?  Will we have our ventilation system updated with U.V. filtration systems?  How will students use the bathroom?  How will students get their lunch?  How will students be held accountable for maintaining their distance?   I am already well aware that some of our elementary students are resisting the mask mandate.  What will this look like?  Will we offer remote learning for parents who choose to keep their children home?  I am concerned for our immuno-compromised staff and family members.  What will it look like if someone from our school tests positive for Covid?  

    Is it worth the risk?  I say, no it’s not. I’ve voiced my opinions and I’ve even been asked by human resources if I plan to return to school. Will we receive hazard pay?  Do I get a choice about teaching remotely if I want or need to? I do plan to return, but putting my life on the line certainly was never something I thought I’d have to do for teaching. Suffice it to say, I will have to “put my affairs in order” before returning this fall. I’ve also ordered all the PPE I will need to protect myself. Never thought I’d have to order PPE for the classroom.  Wonder if I can write that off?  Oh yeah, right. The Trump tax reform took away write-offs for teachers who purchase school supplies.    

    And now a little about science education.  It matters. It matters because the public should understand the urgency of how contagious Covid-19 is and how to best protect themselves.  Wearing a mask shouldn’t even be a question about constitutional rights. It is pointedly a matter of life-saving consideration for others. I am thankful for the knowledge I could share with my students. They understand the science of the situation and most importantly could prepare and protect themselves. What’s maddening, is that all of this –  ALL. OF. THIS. – could have been prevented.  It’s mind boggling to me that Trump dismantled the pandemic team.  In my gut, I knew that we were in for a long haul.  I just hope the people who have died will not have died in vain, that the masses will be motivated to vote their values and that their values include saving the lives of others.  

    Godspeed to the teachers.

  • Help Needed to Support the Census

     Contributed by John Woods.

    Fisherman’s Mark is seeking assistance from Indivizzies to support the 2020 Census, by distributing posters, flyers and other information pieces to reassure and help their clients complete the Census information. There is a special need for volunteers who speak Spanish. Workers will begin visiting households that have not completed their Census on Tuesday, August 11. For more information, contact John Woods at 609-306-5163. If you speak Spanish and would like to volunteer, call Richard Zapata at 609-397-0194.

  • ILNH FYI

    ILNH FYI

    Environmental Group:  ILNH Environmental Action Group joined 150+ groups to Stop Environmental Racism & Fight for Environmental Justice calling the assembly to pass S232/A2212 by July 30, 2020. See below: 

    Dear Members of the NJ State Assembly,

    It is long known that communities of color and low-income neighborhoods often bear the greatest burden of pollution and COVID has only exacerbated the problem. This impacts our physical and economic health, quality of life, and ability to thrive, learn, and work.

    Unfortunately, the NJ Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) currently does not have a policy in place directing it to review pollution permit applications based on the cumulative impacts of toxic air from polluting facilities in a neighborhood.

    That’s why it’s so important a strong cumulative impacts bill (S232/A2212, Singleton-Weinberg- Ruiz+2/McKeon-Vainieri Huttle-Timberlake+13) passes committee today and the full Assembly on July 30th. This bill has already passed the Senate and has the strong support of Governor Murphy, Senator Booker, the NJ Urban Mayors Association, Lt. Governor Oliver, and DEP Commissioner McCabe.

    The bill is up in the Assembly Environment this afternoon and gives the DEP the authority under reasonable circumstances to reduce cumulative disproportionate pollution impacts in already overburdened communities. It is a needed first step in correcting a legacy of environmental racism and injustice by expanding the rights of residents to weigh in on decisions, reducing disproportionate pollution burdens, promoting clean businesses over toxic industries, and making New Jersey a leader in the fight for environmental justice. For more information on the bill, see the attached FAQ.

    This bill is long overdue. We urge you to do everything in your power, not just voting for but speaking up, to ensure a bill that not only stops future environmental injustice but also begins to reduce existing disproportionate and unfair pollution burdens. Help us get the strongest bill possible on the Governor’s desk by July 30th.

    The importance of passing this legislation into law could not be greater as the federal government works to roll back protections. We need our state to step up, be courageous and honor the legacy of John Lewis, civil rights leader and congressman, who passed away this weekend.

    To discuss this further please contact: Dr. Ana Baptista, 973-342-6056, baptista@newschool.edu;

    Kim Gaddy, 973-420-7925, kgaddy@cleanwater.org; 

    Maria Lopez-Nunez, 201-978-6660, mlopeznunez@ironboundcc.org; and/or 

    Dr. Nicky Sheats, 609-558-4987, newbian8@verizon.net.

    Let’s not just say Black Lives Matter, let’s mean it, justice delayed is justice denied. 

    Civil Rights: The ILNH Civil Rights Action Group is calling for support for NJ Bill S2519/A4235.  

    This bill requires public health emergency credits to be awarded to certain inmates during a public health emergency declared by the Governor in order to provide remission of time from their sentences. The COVID-19 death rate of inmates in New Jersey is the highest in the country. While the State of New Jersey has been severely impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, inmates in this State have been afflicted at a particularly alarming rate, as the inability of inmates to quarantine or practice social distancing creates a higher risk to their lives. In providing a method to award these credits, it is the sponsor’s intent to expedite the release of certain inmates who are approaching the end of their sentences in order to reduce the risk of harm to inmates and correctional facility staff, while simultaneously protecting the public safety. This bill provides for public health emergency credits to be awarded to certain inmates in the event a public health emergency is declared by the Governor that arises as a result of a communicable or infectious disease, and results in the modification of correctional facility operations. Under the bill, public health emergency credits are to be awarded to any inmate in the custody of the Department of Corrections who is serving a sentence or receiving jail credits applicable to the sentence. The credits would provide further remission from both the maximum and minimum term of the inmate’s sentence at the rate of six months for each month, or portion of each month, served during the declared emergency with a maximum of 12 months of remission to be awarded for any declared emergency period. The award of public health emergency credits is not to limit or affect an inmate’s eligibility for parole consideration. Public health emergency credits are not to be awarded under the bill to an inmate who has been deemed a repetitive, compulsive sex offender. The bill also provides that juvenile offenders, other than those deemed to be repetitive, compulsive sex offenders, are eligible to receive public health emergency credits. The bill further provides that these juveniles are eligible to receive other credits provided under current law. More resources can be found at https://www.njcaic.org/decarceratecovid19

    NJ CAIC

    #DecarcerateCOVID19 Public Health Credit S2519/ A4235 — NJ CAIC

    We stand for humanity and ask our legislators to stand in solidarity and Support S2519/ A4235 to #DecarcerateCOVID19 and #SayTheirNames

  • How Can We DeFund the Police? Blog Series by Karen Gaffney

    Dr. Karen Gaffney, an English professor at Raritan Valley Community College and author of Dismantling the Racism Machine: A Manual and Toolbox, recently wrote a 4-part blog post series called, “For Those Who Say How Can We Defund the Police.” In it, she walks the reader through a brief history of policing in the US, including what happened to policing after the civil rights movement, as well as current challenges to police accountability, all of which we need to understand in order to recognize the relationship between policing and systemic racism. Though the language of “defunding the police” and “abolition” are new to many people, Black feminist scholar-activists like Ruth Wilson Gilmore have been working in this area for decades. If you are interested in an introduction to these ideas and how they can lead to action, please check out Karen’s blog by starting with Part 1 here. 

  • Fast-tracking COVID-19 Vaccine Poses Some Threats

    Contributed by Amara Willey.

    The FDA announced at the end of June that any vaccine candidate would need to demonstrate a high effectiveness level before going into more widespread human trials. The agency could issue an emergency use authorization (EUA), but indicated that might be counterproductive.

    “Any misstep risks eroding confidence in vaccines that could have lasting implications,” explained Lois Privor-Dumm, policy director at the International Vaccine Access Center at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.  

    Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Missouri), the chairman of a Senate Appropriations subcommittee, has raised concerns about surveys showing that roughly half of Americans would be reluctant to get a COVID-19 vaccine and 20% don’t plan to get one. Blunt promised that research into candidate vaccines would not move too fast or cut corners, citing the effectiveness of the smallpox and polio vaccines.

    The FDA guidelines suggest that the agency will not be so quick to agree to EUA, according to Barron’s. If it did not, the vaccine could take much longer, up to four years, to develop safely.

    Currently, pharmaceutical companies Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Pfizer Inc. and Moderna Inc. are taking part in the administration’s “Warp Speed” program, in the race to develop and produce a vaccine that could be widely distributed.

    The FDA has mandated that any vaccine show an initial effectiveness rate of more than 50% over a placebo before going into larger scale human trials. The Pfizer vaccine has demonstrated initial positive results in a trial of 45 human subjects but whether that company will meet the FDA standards is unknown. Several companies, including Moderna, are embarking on phase two testing in larger human trials.

    Pfizer announced that it is planning a 30,000-person trial by the end of July with its Germany-based partner, BioNTech. The company claims that it will be able to release a vaccine by October and produce 100 million vaccines by the end of the year. Pfizer plans include the release of 1.2 billion doses of the vaccine in 2021 if successful.

    Head of Pfizer, Albert Bourla, said, “If things go well, and the stars are aligned, we will have enough evidence of safety and efficacy so that we can… have a vaccine around the end of October,” according to the Associated French Press and reported by The Jerusalem Post.

    This timeline is not coincidental. An approved vaccine by the fall could mean re-election for Donald Trump. It could also mean a rise in stocks in a number of sectors and be good for the economy overall.

    The federal government is funding many of the vaccine-development projects, and there is some concern that the administration will apply pressure to release the vaccine before the election. The FDA’s guidance seems to alleviate some fears that the vaccine will be approved before it’s safe to do so.

    “Even if the science delivers, our political leaders may fail the test by overly politicizing the process to a point that it will take longer than anticipated for a sufficient number of people to agree to be vaccinated to reach herd immunity in the U.S.,” according to Beacon Policy Advisors founder Brandon Barford.

    Three top scientists involved in Operation Warp Speed deny political pressure from the White House or other agencies in terms of the selection of companies to develop a vaccine, the timing of vaccine development, the announcement of a vaccine or “any other aspect that is part of your responsibility on the medical side,” according to Dr. Francis Collins, the director of the National Institutes of Health. The other two scientists were Dr. Robert Redfield, director of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and Dr. Gary Disbrow, acting director of the federal Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA). Disbrow said, “”I’m a scientist, not a politician.”

    If the vaccine does receive EUA status, it will be released first to health-care workers. This would ease the need for politicians to impose further lockdowns and would help the economy, according to Michael Brush, a financial writer for the New York Times and The Economist. However, it would not necessarily prevent a fall-winter resurgence of the virus.

    With the FDA’s standards for an emergency use authorization not much lower than what’s needed for full approval, the first authorization seems more likely to happen in early 2021, said Geoffrey Porges, an analyst with SVB Leerink, Bloomberg reported.

    The announcement by U.S. regulators should put citizens at ease as it “suggests that regardless of political pressure, the FDA continues to apply sound regulatory judgment and expertise to the development of all medical products, particularly vaccines, regardless of the severity of the economic, political, or public health urgency of the current situation,” Porges said. “For that integrity, the general public, the biopharma industry, and all of its investors should be grateful.”

    The federal government has allocated more than $9 billion for Operation Warp Speed to research and develop COVID-19 vaccines. It has pledged to manufacture candidate vaccines even before it’s clear whether they will work, to ensure that a supply will be immediately available if one or more are shown to be safe and effective. 

    Dr. Collins of the NIH warned that the current approach of Operation Warp Speed – with a lot of drugs potentially being thrown out – will be expensive, but that the current national emergency demands such aggressive action. 

    Operation Warp Speed appears to have access to substantial resources. Congress has directed almost $10 billion through supplemental funding, including the CARES Act. In addition, more than $6.5 billion was designated for countermeasure development through BARDA and $3 billion for NIH research.

    The list of institutions involved in the operation includes almost every medical entity within the federal government, including the FDA, CDC, NIH and BARDA as well as the Defense Department, private firms and other federal agencies, including the Department of Agriculture, the Department of Energy and the Department of Veterans Affairs.

    Warp Speed will be run by a mix of scientists, regulators, and the military, with the presumption that only the U.S. military will have the capability to rapidly distribute and deploy a vaccine or vaccines once they are available. 

    Sources: